Teammates on the mat, best friends off it. Israel’s Rhythmic Gymnastics teammates, Linoy Ashram and Nicol Zelikman reveal how their friendship keeps them going - and growing. They talk about their role model, explain what makes their friendship “complete”, and how qualifying for the Tokyo 2020 Games together was always the goal

It’s over for Austrian tennis star Dominic Thiem and French sensation Kristina Mladenovic. The couple, who were first linked in 2017, appear to have parted ways, based on curious comments mad…

“Caveat emptor” seems rather paradoxical when observing the plight of Bury F.C. In August, Bury F.C. became the first club since Maidstone United in 1992 to be expelled from the English Football League (EFL). The 125-year old club was facing severe financial difficulties as far back as 2013, when it was bought by Stewart Day and saved from bankruptcy. Its debts were mounting in late 2018 when Day sold the club to Steve Dale for £11. The club then faced a winding-up petition, adjourned three times, which was dismissed by the High Court in July 2019. Bury’s creditors then approved a company voluntary agreement (CVA) that intended to settle some of their debts but left “non-football” creditors (including HMRC) only 25 per cent of what they were owed. In EFL Regulations, a CVA is a qualifying insolvency event; the league accordingly imposed a 12-point penalty2 on Bury and cancelled six fixtures. Ultimately the High Court dismissed3 the CVA on 31 July 2019. On 8 August, the EFL gave Bury a 14-day “do or die”4 deadline to come up with a plan to repay outstanding creditors or be expelled. Despite initially failing to do so, and after Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and Bury North MP James Frith implored the league for an extension, Dale brokered a deal with C&N Sporting Risk for the sale of the club. This deal, nonetheless, collapsed. The EFL expelled Bury F.C.5 from the league on 27 August 2019. HMRC has since brought a winding-up petition against the club on 16 October that has been adjourned for two weeks, allowing Bury breathing space to settle with small business creditors. The EFL rejected a proposal for Bury to re-enter League Two in the 2020-21 season. What went wrong? Commentators are currently divided as to what or indeed who was at fault but evidently a range of factors played their part. The more obvious drivers of Bury’s decline include poor governance by both the owners and regulators, although it is important to note the vast financial inequalities in the landscape that is English football. In the 2017-18 season the 20 Premier League clubs made combined operating profits before transfers of £900m. This stands in stark contrast to the 72 clubs in the Championship and Leagues One and Two which sustained combined losses of £411m. Loss-making lower league clubs, such as Bury F.C., face an inherent financial disadvantage. Despite this palpably unequal playing field, it is worth reiterating that Bury is the first club to be expelled from the league for 27 years; the unstable financial state of the lower leagues is not exclusive to Bury and ultimately not the root cause of its fall. We must therefore focus on the specific issues that plagued Bury and led to its demise. Irresponsible ownership There are strong arguments to support the notion that Bury was driven to expulsion due to the actions of its owners. In pursuit of promotion Bury’s penultimate owner, the aforementioned Stewart Day, purchased players through loaning money to the club from his property businesses, then converting the cash to shares. When these businesses became insolvent, Bury instantly could not afford to pay its players and staff. In a move thought of as unthinkable by many, Day also mortgaged Gigg Lane6 itself and the lender is now owed £3.7m. This loan allegedly accrues interest at almost £1,500 per day – a heavy loss for a debt-ridden club and a critical sticking point for C&N during the takeover talks. Of the 51 companies that Bury’s final owner has been associated with, 43 have been liquidated. Steve Dale bought the club for £1, insisting that he had proved to the EFL that Bury had sufficient funds to start the season. Within months Dale had arranged an inadequate insolvency process and had called on the fans to “chip in” to save the club7. Dale, who had previously confessed to the BBC that he “didn’t even know there was a football team called Bury”8, did not comply with the EFL rules that maintain owners must have the money to sustain their clubs. It is clear that a portion of the blame lies with these two owners of the club. The last two owners of the club demonstrated a clear lack of responsibility and have flouted the rules. Yet their ability to do so indicates a flawed system; cracks in the EFL governance that need to be reinforced or reformed. Governance – need for an overhaul? The EFL and The FA have come under sustained criticism by individuals and bodies ranging from the Bury MP James Frith9 to the potential rescuer of Bury F.C., C&N Sporting Risk. In the authors’ view, the main governance issues can be narrowed down to the following: Enforcement of rules, Lack of independent regulation, and Punishing the club, not the owners. The EFL’s first failing was to allow Steve Dale to become owner with such limited evidence he could save the club. Former manager Neil Warnock described this decision as “criminal” and accused the EFL of not carrying out the necessary due diligence, in other words not knowing the extent of Bury’s debts. Under the rules new owners are supposed to demonstrate “proof of funding”, yet there is no punishment for one who does not. It is the club, not the owner, who is sanctioned. Furthermore, the EFL rules are supposed to restrict clubs’ spending to within their means. As mentioned earlier Stewart Day was able to circumvent this by investing the extra capital into shares instead of taking loans. The result was that Bury could not afford to repay its debts nor pay its players and staff. Finally, the EFL’s response to C&N’s request for an extension to complete due diligence and finish the deal was to give the company one working day. The process usually takes weeks. The EFL has since committed to upgrade its regulations to ensure Bury’s fate is never repeated. Key questions arising are: Is this an admission of failure? Will the reforms go far enough? The EFL has commissioned an independent review10 into the rules and measures regarding the financial sustainability of its clubs which is a step in the right direction. It is, however, worth noting that the Football Leagues have maintained that their rules are robust and do not require independent regulation; perhaps Bury’s example is proof of the opposite. Lastly, the EFL’s decisions to penalise Bury F.C. by suspending games, deducting points and ultimate expulsion do not address the root problems. The sanctions impact the players, staff and fans but do not target the perpetrators of the club’s problems: the owners, who have come away largely unscathed. Conclusion At the heart of the tragic events at Bury lies a fundamental lack of good governance. It is the system in place that allowed both Dale and Day to act the way they did; the inadequate regulation enabled the irresponsible ownership. Tighter regulation would surely protect clubs and communities from similar scenarios. So what comes next for Bury F.C.? Re-entry to a lower league as a “phoenix club” - This is perfectly possible and has been demonstrated by Aldershot and Maidstone, both of whom were expelled by the EFL and then started again. Relegation by several tiers is typical which would mean that Bury could play next season in the Northern Premier League's North West Division. The players - Many players have already left and those who remain are free agents due to their contracts being invalidated. In addition, their wages have not been paid since March.  The stadium - Gigg Lane would usually be the Bury F.C.’s most valuable asset but there is a £3.7m mortgage that drove potential rescuers away. If the phoenix club cannot use the stadium, they will have to find a smaller and cheaper ground. Reinstatement? - The EFL have been clear in stating that their decision is conclusive and is not subject to an appeals procedure – they will, however, face continued pressure from MPs and fans which could change this. This article has been republished with the permission of the author. The original is available to view here11. The article is a general summary of the law. It should not replace legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. {slider References|closed} 1 Ben Rumsby, “'The fans have got to chip in': Bury owner Steve Dale says supporters must help save club from extinction”, thetelegraph.co.uk, 23 Aug 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2019/08/23/fans-have-got-chip-bury-owner-steve-dale-says-supporters-must/ 2 EFL Statement: Bury FC, 25 July 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.efl.com/news/2019/july/efl-statement-bury-fc2/ 3 ‘Bury: Winding-up petition against League One club dismissed by High Court’, bbc.com, 31 July 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/49178564 4 EFL Statement: Bury FC update, 8 Aug 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.efl.com/news/2019/august/efl-statement-bury-fc-update2/ 5 David Conn, ‘Bury expelled from EFL after 125 years as takeover collapses’, guardian.co.uk, 28 Aug 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.theguardian.com/football/2019/aug/27/bury-takeover-cn-sporting-risk-collapses-hours-before-football-league-deadline 6 David Conn, ‘Series of grinding failures that left proud, historic Bury in ruins’, guardian.co.uk, 27 Aug 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.theguardian.com/football/2019/aug/27/bury-historic-club-football-league-financial-ruins 7 See Footnote 1 8 Five Live, Twitter.com, 24 Aug 19, https://twitter.com/bbc5live/status/1164956024106889217?lang=en (last accessed 15 Nov 19) 9 James Frith, Bury FC Statement, 30 Sept 19, https://jamesfrith.org/buryfc/ 10 ‘Bury: EFL commissions independent review of regulations after club's demise’, bbc.com, 5 Sept 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/49595246 11 Tom Bruce, ‘Inn the Field of Play - November 2019: Bury Beware’, farrer.co.uk, 29 Oct 19, last accessed 15 Nov 19, https://www.farrer.co.uk/news-and-insights/inn-the-field-of-play-november2019/?utm_source=vuture&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=inn%20the%20field%20of%20play_15%20november%202019  {/sliders}    

It’s half-time in Japan’s year of sporting mega-events with the Rugby World Cup behind it and the 2020 Olympics ahead, the sponsorship frenzy that has gone alongside those events carries a lesson for the world – Japan is still a commercial powerhouse.

500.4k Likes, 6,853 Comments - Floyd Mayweather (@floydmayweather) on Instagram: “@danawhite and I working together again to bring the world another spectacular event in 2020.…”

Get all the advantages of a drop set while still lifting heavy.